If many Owner/Operators invested in the wrong decor, should PJB pay for changes with corporate capex?
Restaurant chains are turning their attention to families - RestBusi
If many Owner/Operators invested in the wrong decor, should PJB pay for changes with corporate capex?
Restaurant chains are turning their attention to families - RestBusi
"Over the past decade or so, McDonald’s has renovated its restaurants to make them sleeker and more modern. In the process, it has largely removed playful colors and mascots, sparking criticism that locations felt gray and generic. The company is now looking at “injecting some of the playfulness” back while making layouts airier and more open, according to Jill McDonald, who took over as the company’s chief restaurant experience officer last year."
Wasn't the new decor one of PJB's first initiatives after joining McDonald's?
McDonald's Corporation held its 2026 annual meeting on May 20th. Results of the voting for officers and directors have been published.
McDonald's has 710 million shares outstanding
The typical board member received just under 500 million votes "For" serving until the 2027 board meeting.
There are always votes "against" certain director candidates. Aside from the CEO/Chairman, the average director received 11 million "Against" votes.
The CEO/Chairman received nearly 39 million votes "Against".
Some have speculated that this highly negative vote was a complaint related to the same person serving as CEO and Chairman. Or, it could just be a reaction to the recent performance of McDonald's shares.
Or it could be a reaction to the CEO's oddball behavior on social media and a fear that the CEO is not a serious or stable person.
.
Unknown commented on "Starbucks CEO Has Blunt Message on Discounts"
May 6, 2026
"Got a call from my Field Office Vice-President - "It looks like your not following the recomnedation of Deliotte pricing on under $3, just wanted to bring it to your attention, your affected pricing is above what it was previously" No S..t, I am already discounting a McChicken a dollar lower than before and explain their whole math to them. I also mentioned just spending close to $50K average per restaurant on Technology and just recevied my new NRBES which is probably over $100k per restaurant and McD's want six month plan to complete. Ok so let's sell basically items under $3, lower a dozen or so other items which items sold now at discount will be over 50% of the products sold, not sure where they think the money will be coming from."
At Starbucks, pen and paper beats AI
"As the chain suggested, restaurants should consider where AI really adds value—and where it just adds more work."
Given the growing popularity of soccer, this appears to be a good move and should benefit the brand worldwide. Just don't stick the Chicago Owner/Operator with the entire bill.
Chicago soccer club to name McDonald's stadium
=========================================================================
Anyone who follows or invests in publicly traded stocks has seen situations where the price of the stock takes a hit due to unexpected results or some news that frightens investors. Very often, the price of the stock will rebound, sometimes the next day, and sometimes back to a newer high. This is a sign that investors have confidence that management has the skills and experience to move the company forward. Without this confidence, the stock price will stagnate or drift lower.
![]() |
| Source: stockcharts.com |
From QSR Magazine:
"However, Borden and Kempczinski emphasized that development decisions will be based on returns rather than hitting a fixed unit target.
“We’re not chasing an absolute growth number,” Kempczinski said, noting that locations that no longer meet return thresholds due to rising construction or supply chain costs will be removed from the pipeline."
Not chasing a number? They've been chasing a number since the announcement of "Accelerating the Arches". It's obvious this inexperienced management team, with little experience building stores, is running into snags they didn't expect.
While it's not a scientific measurement, there have been numerous press articles about cities, towns, and communities giving the corporation a hard time about permitting a location. For an experienced McDonald's person, this is nothing new. It's been happening since the 1970s. There's always a group in the area who think they know better, or one or two grey-haired hippies on the local council or planning board. But PJB wouldn't know that.
Using construction costs as an excuse is silly since they can just pass those costs on to the franchisee. Unless they are building a McOpCo, and it doesn't seem they'll be doing much of that.
So, PJB is laying the groundwork for a future admission that he can't make the previously announced goals.
If one reads the analyst's comments in both the transcript and the press, it's obvious that management will be selling a bunch of McOpCos this summer. A CEO with no restaurant experience can't make money in the restaurant business? Who'da thunk it?
There have been many comments mentioning OPNAD. While I doubt McDonald's Owners read them, profiles and press releases about McDonald's corporate personnel often mention that the featured person has been involved in "modernizing" McDonald's.
What about modernizing OPNAD?
OPNAD was launched in the late 1960s as an Owner/Operator initiative.
Keep in mind, in the late 1960s:
The Vietnam War was at its peak.
Lyndon Johnson was POTUS.
Seat belts were only an option in new cars.
No one on McDonald's senior management team had been born yet.
Yet, OPNAD keeps marching along as though it is part of the McDonald's franchise. It's really not. It's just that management has worked hard at making it seem so.
If McDonald's Owner/Operators are unhappy with, or don't trust, OPNAD, shouldn't this financial powerhouse be modernized?
".....accusing the fast-food chain of a litany of problems, including cannibalizing its stores with new locations, marketing problems and royalties on delivery orders."
“Plaintiffs have suffered millions of dollars in damages and seek all remedies permitted by law.”
Soft serve on a Filet-O-Fish - Something a 13-year-old would do
If this guy had any adult supervision he wouldn't be allowed on the internet
Grok says:
No, the same person should not automatically serve as both corporate CEO and chair of the board. While it's common in the U.S. (especially among larger companies), the balance of governance principles, potential risks, and empirical evidence leans toward separating the roles in most cases—particularly for mature public companies. The decision ultimately depends on the company's size, stage, culture, and specific circumstances, but separation is increasingly viewed as a stronger governance practice.
Arguments in favor of combining CEO and Chair roles (stewardship or "unity of command" perspective):
Arguments against combining the roles (agency theory perspective, emphasizing checks and balances):
Empirical research on performance is mixed and inconclusive overall. Many meta-analyses and studies find no strong, consistent link between duality and better (or worse) firm performance, risk-taking, or compensation. Outcomes often depend on context: duality may suit high-complexity, innovative, or dynamic environments, while separation benefits firms needing stronger monitoring. Forced splits sometimes correlate with poorer results, suggesting boards should choose based on firm-specific needs rather than blanket rules.
In short, while a talented, trustworthy leader can handle both roles effectively in the right setting, separating them generally promotes healthier accountability, reduces conflicts, and aligns better with modern expectations of good corporate governance. Boards should evaluate this thoughtfully rather than defaulting to tradition—ask: What structure best serves shareholders and long-term value here? Many successful companies thrive either way, but the default presumption should favor independence unless there's a compelling reason otherwise.
Written entirely by Grok, I just cut and paste
https://grok.com/
Recent events have shown that he needs adult supervision.
NLPC's explanation of their action is in a press release HERE
Please note that the above press release includes a link to their version of PJB's history. The link is just above his picture.
After embarrassing himself and brand McDonald's with silly social media postings, a competent CEO would lie low for a while and work on long-term image repair. But not PJB. He's obsessed with being a celebrity and calls in the Wall Street Journal to expand his profile.
I missed this one by a month or so, but McDonald's recently added (IMHO) a celebrity director to its board, Ford CEO James Farley. I've noticed Farley on the business channels for his ease in interviews. His responses aren't canned and rehearsed directly out of Ford's PR department.
Plus, he's a real "car-guy."
Plus, he's a cousin of the late Saturday Night Live star Chris Farley. You'll see the resemblance.
He's a far more interesting person than most on the BOD.
James D. Farley Jr. elected to McDonald's board
Jonathan Maze on X
@jonathanmaze
"Finally tried the upgraded Whopper. I stopped on my way home from the airport, went through the DT and ate it in the parking lot like a surprising big percentage of fast-food visits.
Exceptional burger. The upgrades are subtle yet very effective, especially the improved bun and the packaging. Still a Whopper. It’s just a better Whopper. Impressive stuff."
Restaurants and Politics:
Midterm elections as seen by the National Restaurant Association
I'd bet that very few McDonald's franchisees have ever touched, paged through, or read their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD). Especially with the number of next-gen Owner/Operators and former employees in the Operator ranks. Most signed up without reading anything.
A lot gets written about the costs of delivery impacting restaurant operators. Maybe the question should be, why would the average consumer spend the extra money to have your food delivered?
If the industry focus is on "value," why are restaurants promoting the most expensive way to access the product?
My household spent a lot of money on delivery during the pandemic. Then we enjoyed going out and our trips to the grocery store. Lately, for various reasons, we've ordered more from McDonald's (Big Arch) and a few other chains. Gosh, it's expensive! Those fees! The gratuities! At least as compared to jumping in the car and driving a few minutes to my local McDonald's.
It's my impression that some people can afford to have their food delivered. But for those who can't or won't, no amount of advertising will force them to carve out more of their budget for food delivery.
Trying to increase sales with "value" and also trying to increase delivery sales are contradictory messages.
From now on, I'll see you at the drive-thru.
This editorial from QSR magazine discusses how a brand's CEO might be a plus or a minus on social media.
From @McFranchisee on X (formerly Twitter)
Mar 2
This video will probably get half a billion views, worth millions in free advertising. It’s like getting a Super Bowl commercial for free. I bet @McDonalds will sell at the high end of the range because of this.
It officially drops tomorrow. BTW, can’t wait to see Chris’s next video.
@McFranchisee Mar 4
Big Arch - Chris K - CEO Video
Love it, hate it, call it cringe, or just scroll past - this thing blew up bigger than the Golden Arches themselves. It went global. Even our competitors had to respond. Probably the most unintentionally viral moment in
@McDonalds history, out-meming even the Evil Grimace saga.
Yes, most of the hot takes roasting Chris were off-base, but the facts are: we have sold a SERIOUS amount Big Arch Burgers because of it. He’s probably grinning ear to ear with a mouth full of product right now, thanks to the massive free advertising for the burger he actually created. Sometimes the best “marketing” is the kind nobody planned.